AUDIT USA Americans United for Democracy, Integrity and Transparency in Elections
  • Elections belong to the people
  • Ballot Images Project
    • Project Overview
    • Understanding Ballot Images and Related Documents
    • Get Involved
    • North Carolina Voting Systems
    • Legal Action
    • For Candidates and Campaign Leaders
    • States/Counties that Use Ballot Images from Paper Ballots
    • Documentation and Manuals for ES&S DS850’s and DS200’s
  • About
    • About AUDIT Elections USA
    • Our Team
  • Media
    • Media Inquiries
    • News
    • Archive
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Contact
  • Elections belong to the people
  • Ballot Images Project
    • Project Overview
    • Understanding Ballot Images and Related Documents
    • Get Involved
    • North Carolina Voting Systems
    • Legal Action
    • For Candidates and Campaign Leaders
    • States/Counties that Use Ballot Images from Paper Ballots
    • Documentation and Manuals for ES&S DS850’s and DS200’s
  • About
    • About AUDIT Elections USA
    • Our Team
  • Media
    • Media Inquiries
    • News
    • Archive
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Contact
November 21, 2012  |  By John Brakey In Arizona, Election Fraud, Pima County, Transparency

Arizona Election Fraud: Supervisors Accept County Shenanigans, Reject a Proper Audit

J.T. Waldron

The Pima County Board of Supervisors refused to conduct a proper hand-count audit of the 2012 general election ballots. This decision was made despite seasoned statisticians and computer experts in its own Election Integrity Commission indicating that the county’s elections are not verifiable in their current state.

The primary reason? Timing. Pima County’s use of this rationale is ironic because it appears that the county was in complete control its timing. As EIC member Mickey Duniho states in reference to Pima County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry:

“Mr. Huckelberry unilaterally postponed the recommendation without consulting or informing the Election Integrity Commission. This violated the Commission’s right to advise the Board of Supervisors without interference, and it also violated basic rules of courtesy.”

This postponement plays a role in solidifying the board’s argument that ‘it’s too late’.

Huckelberry’s recent memo, which is rife with distortions and errors, states that it’s impossible to do a hand count audit. Such hyperbole was thoroughly eviscerated by Mickey Duniho’s point by point response to the erroneous memo. Duniho provided his rebuttal in writing to each member of the board of supervisors.

“Your elections are being run by a sociopath,” said EIC member Jim March. Elections Director Brad Nelson was held under a burning magnifying glass in the most recent Board of Supervisors meeting as March leveled a series of new charges against Nelson. First, March states that Nelson had his county-issued credit card yanked for fraud, yet he still keeps his job.

Other charges had to do with Nelson’s management style with his employers. According to March, employees are willing to recall how they were retained because it was easy for Nelson to “make them cry” and “that’s something he needed to do on occasion”. Finally, March accused Nelson of breaking the law as he states that Nelson would ask temporary staff and poll workers to switch their party allegiance so that he can continue to retain these employees for future tasks.

Jim March’s history of careful, meticulous analysis  before calling any one person’s reputation into question adds significant weight to these charges.  We can only hope that an independent investigation into Brad Nelson’s activities will take place. 

The only Supervisor concerned about having verifiable elections for this elections cycle was Ray Carroll, a Republican who has consistently moved to transcend party affiliation and improve transparency.

Arizona solidifies its national reputation as the ‘meth lab of democracy’ because those who can intervene refuse to make direct, immediate, substantive changes to the elections process.

Help Us Transmit This Story

  Add to Your Blogger Account   Put it On Facebook   Tweet this post   Print it from your printer   Email and a collection of other outlets   Try even more services
Please share
Previous StoryArizona Election Fraud: Pima County Issues Memo with Numerous Factual Errors
Next StoryArizona Election Fraud: Is Arizona’s Secretary of State Feigning Ignorance Over Terry Goddard’s RTA Investigation?

Related Articles

  • Ohio Supreme Court Building
    Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted & Two Counties Sued to Prevent Destruction of Election Materials
  • John Brakey
    Ballot Images Create a Paradigm Shift in Verifying Elections

2 replies added

  1. My-Web November 27, 2012 Reply

    ads classified classifieddownload blog blog blog blog SEO SEO Earn Money Online

  2. Pingback: Santa Cruz County Elections Director Violates State Law by Refusing Libertarian Party Observers at the Polls » Election Nightmares

    […] seems to have adopted a tactic similar to Pima County. Provide the initial appearance of cooperation before last minute maneuvers skirt transparency on […]

    Reply

Leave your comment Cancel Reply

(will not be shared)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search This Site

Categories

Stay Connected with AUDIT-USA

Donate to Support AUDIT-USA

Blog Calendar

November 2012
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Oct   Dec »

Recent Posts

  • North Carolina Faced with Unverifiable Elections
  • California To County Election Officials: You Must Preserve Digital Ballot Images from Voting Machines
  • Government Technology: Florida’s Election Hardware Troubles Are Nothing New
  • BREAKING NEWS: TRANSPARENCY ADVOCATES SCORE VICTORY IN FLORIDA
  • Here’s How the Country Could Actually Secure Our Elections If Politicians Actually Cared to Try
  • Home
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • Blog
  • Media Inquiries
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms

Copyright ©2018-19 AUDIT-USA. All Rights Reserved

en_USEnglish
en_USEnglish