AUDIT USA Americans United for Democracy, Integrity and Transparency in Elections
  • Elections belong to the people
  • Ballot Images Project
    • Project Overview
    • Understanding Ballot Images and Related Documents
    • Get Involved
    • North Carolina Voting Systems
    • Legal Action
    • For Candidates and Campaign Leaders
    • States/Counties that Use Ballot Images from Paper Ballots
    • Documentation and Manuals for ES&S DS850’s and DS200’s
  • About
    • About AUDIT Elections USA
    • Our Team
  • Media
    • Media Inquiries
    • News
    • Archive
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Contact
  • Elections belong to the people
  • Ballot Images Project
    • Project Overview
    • Understanding Ballot Images and Related Documents
    • Get Involved
    • North Carolina Voting Systems
    • Legal Action
    • For Candidates and Campaign Leaders
    • States/Counties that Use Ballot Images from Paper Ballots
    • Documentation and Manuals for ES&S DS850’s and DS200’s
  • About
    • About AUDIT Elections USA
    • Our Team
  • Media
    • Media Inquiries
    • News
    • Archive
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Contact
April 26, 2016  |  By John Brakey In Arizona, Election Fraud, Maricopa County, Pima County, U.S. Complicity, Voter Disenfranchisement

Lunchtime update on today’s testimony

AUDIT-AZ’s lawsuit challenging the Arizona Presidential Preference Election (primary) is in its second day. We’re still presenting our case.

Here’s the update as of the lunch break:

This morning our witness Richard Charnin testified remotely. He helped get into the record our estimate that 150,000 voters were disenfranchised in Maricopa County in the Presidential Preference Election (primary). And guess what? It turns out our estimate may be LOW.

To explain as simply as possible, the estimate was created by comparing the voter turnout (people who actually voted, not people who showed up to vote) county by county for this election to the turnout in the 2008 Presidential Preference Election. While the other counties showed increased turnout this year, Maricopa County’s turnout decreased.

We now know that the number we used for comparison in Coconino Co., 3.62% increase in turnout, was a preliminary figure. The real turnout figure for Coconino Co. was 8.63% higher in this year’s election than in the 2008 election. (The 2008 Presidential Preference Election is used for comparison because it’s the most recent presidential primary that’s similar to this one, with no incumbent on the ballot.) So Maricopa County’s turnout numbers indicate even greater disenfranchisement than we previously thought.

Testimony resumes this afternoon with our side (plaintiffs) calling Helen Purcell to the stand. Purcell, as you may remember, is the Maricopa County Recorder, the county’s chief election official.

We anticipate that when we rest our case, the defense will move for summary judgment, as this is standard practice. We expect that motion to be denied, as we’ve certainly proven that there’s ample reason the announced results of this election cannot be trusted.

Then it will be the defense’s turn to put on their case, followed by closing arguments.

AUDIT-AZ Co-Founder and plaintiff John Brakey says, “I’m not going to be happy until ballots are a public record.”

Our case is the only one in the state that has any hope of a remedy for the ‘yuge’ problems in the Presidential Preference Election.

Additionally, John says, “We are concerned about the bond election happening in May and we’re very concerned about the August state primaries.”

Please share this widely.

Find out more about our case on our blog, https://www.auditelectionsusa.org. If someone forwarded this message to you, you can sign up to receive updates in your inbox. Click here to forward this email to a friend

Thank you for all your support!
To integrity and transparency in elections,

John Brakey and the AUDIT-AZ team

P.S. You can now read witness Dianne Post’s affidavit on our blog. Ms. Post is the poll worker we wrote to you about last night who testified about the electronic poll book system preventing her from giving voters the correct ballots.

Please share
audit az Dianne Post Helen Purcell John Brakey Richard Charmin
Previous StoryCourt went great today! And resumes in the morning …
Next StoryAUDIT-AZ Lawsuit Update: Summary judgment was granted for Pima and Santa Cruz counties but not for Maricopa County

Related Articles

  • North Carolina Faced with Unverifiable Elections
  • Error message on computer screen
    Government Technology: Florida’s Election Hardware Troubles Are Nothing New

Leave your comment Cancel Reply

(will not be shared)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search This Site

Categories

Stay Connected with AUDIT-USA

Donate to Support AUDIT-USA

Blog Calendar

April 2016
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar   May »

Recent Posts

  • North Carolina Faced with Unverifiable Elections
  • California To County Election Officials: You Must Preserve Digital Ballot Images from Voting Machines
  • Government Technology: Florida’s Election Hardware Troubles Are Nothing New
  • BREAKING NEWS: TRANSPARENCY ADVOCATES SCORE VICTORY IN FLORIDA
  • Here’s How the Country Could Actually Secure Our Elections If Politicians Actually Cared to Try
  • Home
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • Blog
  • Media Inquiries
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms

Copyright ©2018-19 AUDIT-USA. All Rights Reserved

en_USEnglish
en_USEnglish