AUDIT USA Americans United for Democracy, Integrity and Transparency in Elections
  • Elections belong to the people
  • Ballot Images Project
    • Project Overview
    • Understanding Ballot Images and Related Documents
    • Get Involved
    • North Carolina Voting Systems
    • Legal Action
    • For Candidates and Campaign Leaders
    • States/Counties that Use Ballot Images from Paper Ballots
    • Documentation and Manuals for ES&S DS850’s and DS200’s
  • About
    • About AUDIT Elections USA
    • Our Team
  • Media
    • Media Inquiries
    • News
    • Archive
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Contact
  • Elections belong to the people
  • Ballot Images Project
    • Project Overview
    • Understanding Ballot Images and Related Documents
    • Get Involved
    • North Carolina Voting Systems
    • Legal Action
    • For Candidates and Campaign Leaders
    • States/Counties that Use Ballot Images from Paper Ballots
    • Documentation and Manuals for ES&S DS850’s and DS200’s
  • About
    • About AUDIT Elections USA
    • Our Team
  • Media
    • Media Inquiries
    • News
    • Archive
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Contact
June 2, 2016  |  By John Brakey In Election Fraud, Fractionalized Votes, Public Records, U.S. Complicity, Voter Disenfranchisement

Elections Expert Bev Harris Explains How Some People’s Votes Count More than Others

bevstill
bevstill
Bev Harris

After extensive research and fact checking, elections expert Bev Harris has written a series of articles on BlackBoxVoting.org revealing a racist, class oriented U.S. voting system that has nothing to do with popular consent of the governed.

Vote-by-mail ballots are identified with each person who voted and assigned a weighted average that could be determined by individual data such as race, income, political leanings or whatever those who program the voting machines decide.

Like the slaves before the emancipation, people of African descent could easily be assigned, for example, 60% so that their vote is not a single vote, but 60% of one.

Harris spoke at a meeting of top election integrity advocates discussing the current state of U.S. elections and the various options to help make elections transparent and verifiable.

The forum, held on May 29th, 2016, was moderated by Mimi Kennedy and included Bev Harris, Greg Palast, Harvey Wasserman, Bob Fitrakis and John Brakey.


Please share
Bev Harris Black Box Voting Bob Fitrakis Greg Palast Harvey Wasserman John Brakey Mimi Kennedy
Previous StoryAnalysis of Early vs Precinct Voting Differences in the 2016 Pima County, AZ Presidential Preference Election
Next StorySpecious Claim of 7.2 Million Double Voters Used to Purge Voter Roles

Related Articles

  • North Carolina Faced with Unverifiable Elections
  • Error message on computer screen
    Government Technology: Florida’s Election Hardware Troubles Are Nothing New

Leave your comment Cancel Reply

(will not be shared)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search This Site

Categories

Stay Connected with AUDIT-USA

Donate to Support AUDIT-USA

Blog Calendar

June 2016
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« May   Jul »

Recent Posts

  • North Carolina Faced with Unverifiable Elections
  • California To County Election Officials: You Must Preserve Digital Ballot Images from Voting Machines
  • Government Technology: Florida’s Election Hardware Troubles Are Nothing New
  • BREAKING NEWS: TRANSPARENCY ADVOCATES SCORE VICTORY IN FLORIDA
  • Here’s How the Country Could Actually Secure Our Elections If Politicians Actually Cared to Try
  • Home
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • Blog
  • Media Inquiries
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms

Copyright ©2018-19 AUDIT-USA. All Rights Reserved

en_USEnglish
en_USEnglish