AUDIT USA Americans United for Democracy, Integrity and Transparency in Elections
  • Elections belong to the people
  • Ballot Images Project
    • Project Overview
    • Understanding Ballot Images and Related Documents
    • Get Involved
    • North Carolina Voting Systems
    • Legal Action
    • For Candidates and Campaign Leaders
    • States/Counties that Use Ballot Images from Paper Ballots
    • Documentation and Manuals for ES&S DS850’s and DS200’s
  • About
    • About AUDIT Elections USA
    • Our Team
  • Media
    • Media Inquiries
    • News
    • Archive
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Contact
  • Elections belong to the people
  • Ballot Images Project
    • Project Overview
    • Understanding Ballot Images and Related Documents
    • Get Involved
    • North Carolina Voting Systems
    • Legal Action
    • For Candidates and Campaign Leaders
    • States/Counties that Use Ballot Images from Paper Ballots
    • Documentation and Manuals for ES&S DS850’s and DS200’s
  • About
    • About AUDIT Elections USA
    • Our Team
  • Media
    • Media Inquiries
    • News
    • Archive
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Contact
September 2, 2017  |  By John Brakey In 2016 Presidential Election, Election Security, Electronic Pollbooks, North Carolina, Voter Disenfranchisement

NY Times Covers Failed Investigation into North Carolina Voting Fiasco

Voting in Brooklyn
Voting at Public School 62 in Brooklyn in November/Todd Heisler, NYTimes

Finally, really great reporting at the NY Times on election security.

“Michael Wines, who covers election issues for the Times, said that what stood out to him was the vulnerability of the nation’s vast Rube Goldberg election system. Elections, he explained, “are run by understaffed, underfinanced and sometimes undertrained local officials, serviced by outside contractors who may or may not be well vetted, conducted with equipment and software that may or may not be secure.”

And Matthew Rosenberg, who covers national security issues for the Times, discovered that the intelligence community’s conclusion — that the Election Day vote was not hacked — was extremely limited in scope.”

Read the full story at the NY Times website:

In Election Interference, It’s What Reporters Didn’t Find That Matters

Please share
2016 Presidential Election election investigation Election Investigations North Carolina
Previous StoryAbstract: Publicly Verified Elections are Key to De-corrupting Our Democracy NOW!
Next StoryArchive

Related Articles

  • North Carolina Faced with Unverifiable Elections
  • Thom Hartmann interviews Karen McKim of Wisconsin Election Integrity
    Wisconsin Election Officials Certified Presidential Vote Counts Known to be Wrong

Leave your comment Cancel Reply

(will not be shared)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search This Site

Categories

Stay Connected with AUDIT-USA

Donate to Support AUDIT-USA

Blog Calendar

September 2017
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Jun   Dec »

Recent Posts

  • North Carolina Faced with Unverifiable Elections
  • California To County Election Officials: You Must Preserve Digital Ballot Images from Voting Machines
  • Government Technology: Florida’s Election Hardware Troubles Are Nothing New
  • BREAKING NEWS: TRANSPARENCY ADVOCATES SCORE VICTORY IN FLORIDA
  • Here’s How the Country Could Actually Secure Our Elections If Politicians Actually Cared to Try
  • Home
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • Blog
  • Media Inquiries
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms

Copyright ©2018-19 AUDIT-USA. All Rights Reserved

en_USEnglish
en_USEnglish