AUDIT USA Americans United for Democracy, Integrity and Transparency in Elections
  • Elections belong to the people
  • Ballot Images Project
    • Project Overview
    • Understanding Ballot Images and Related Documents
    • Get Involved
    • North Carolina Voting Systems
    • Legal Action
    • For Candidates and Campaign Leaders
    • States/Counties that Use Ballot Images from Paper Ballots
    • Documentation and Manuals for ES&S DS850’s and DS200’s
  • About
    • About AUDIT Elections USA
    • Our Team
  • Media
    • Media Inquiries
    • News
    • Archive
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Contact
  • Elections belong to the people
  • Ballot Images Project
    • Project Overview
    • Understanding Ballot Images and Related Documents
    • Get Involved
    • North Carolina Voting Systems
    • Legal Action
    • For Candidates and Campaign Leaders
    • States/Counties that Use Ballot Images from Paper Ballots
    • Documentation and Manuals for ES&S DS850’s and DS200’s
  • About
    • About AUDIT Elections USA
    • Our Team
  • Media
    • Media Inquiries
    • News
    • Archive
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Contact
April 26, 2016  |  By John Brakey In Arizona, Maricopa County, Pima County, Santa Cruz County

AUDIT-AZ Lawsuit Update: Summary judgment was granted for Pima and Santa Cruz counties but not for Maricopa County

Update from Emily Levy:

Election challenge case update: I just spoke with John Roberts Brakey. The judge will be issuing his final ruling tomorrow morning at 8:00 a.m. to the parties (including us) and at 8:30 to the media.

After we rested our case, as is typical the defense moved for summary judgment. This means they asked the judge to rule on the case in their favor before even presenting a defense. Summary judgment was granted for Pima and Santa Cruz counties but NOT for Maricopa County. As I understand it, this was because our evidence of serious problems with Pima and Santa Cruz Counties’ election processes AUDIT-AZ has documented in past elections wasn’t enough evidence to throw out this year’s election.

Much good has already come from this case, thanks to very hard work by John Brakey, our attorney Michael Kielsky, and the entire AUDIT-AZ team, plus everyone who has been supporting us in ways large and small. We await Judge Gass’ ruling in the morning. We’ll have more to say then.

Please share
David Gass John Brakey Michael Kielsky
Previous StoryLunchtime update on today’s testimony
Next StoryJudge David Gass Rules Against AUDIT-AZ in Elections Lawsuit, Bars Showing Evidence of Systemic Fraud in Arizona Elections

Related Articles

  • North Carolina Faced with Unverifiable Elections
  • Error message on computer screen
    Government Technology: Florida’s Election Hardware Troubles Are Nothing New

1 reply added

  1. CarolB in Mpls. April 26, 2016 Reply

    What? If that doesn’t smack of corruption, what does? See what you can find. Maybe you can appeal on what you do.

Leave a reply

  • Default Comments (1)
  • Facebook Comments

(will not be shared)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search This Site

Categories

Select Category

Stay Connected with AUDIT-USA

Donate to Support AUDIT-USA

Blog Calendar

April 2016
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar   May »

Recent Posts

  • North Carolina Faced with Unverifiable Elections
  • California To County Election Officials: You Must Preserve Digital Ballot Images from Voting Machines
  • Government Technology: Florida’s Election Hardware Troubles Are Nothing New
  • BREAKING NEWS: TRANSPARENCY ADVOCATES SCORE VICTORY IN FLORIDA
  • Here’s How the Country Could Actually Secure Our Elections If Politicians Actually Cared to Try
  • Home
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • Blog
  • Media Inquiries
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms

Copyright ©2018-19 AUDIT-USA. All Rights Reserved

en_USEnglish
en_USEnglish